- Video: Fla. Plot Suspect Arrested with Help of Muslim Community (CAIR)
"The reason he was banned from several mosques is that people were concerned with his extremist views. He was against the Muslim community as a whole. He was against organizations like CAIR," Shibly said. Shibly said Osmakac was eventually reported to law enforcement, and representatives from the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's office said those reports were "significant" in arresting him.- CAIR: Suspect Too Radical for Local Muslim Community
Osmakac said he didn't go to any mosques because, "they're all infidels and because they allow organizations like CAIR to have a presence."
- CAIR: Suspect Too Radical for Local Muslim Community
- CA: Man Gets Five Years in Prison for Mosque Arson, Vandalism
GOOD NEWS ALERT
CAIR: Appeals Court Upholds Muslim Rights in Oklahoma
(WASHINGTON, D.C., 1/10/12) -- The Council on American-Islamic Relations(CAIR) today welcomed a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuitupholding a lower court's decision to block implementation of an Oklahoma state constitutional amendment that would prohibit courts from applying -- or even considering -- "Sharia law" and "international law."
CAIR: Court Upholds Stay of Oklahoma Ban on Islamic Law (AP)
In response to a lawsuit filed in 2010 by Muneer Awad, the head of CAIR's Oklahoma office (CAIR-OK), the lower court blocked implementation of the "Save Our State Amendment" based on arguments that it would unconstitutionally disfavor an entire faith and deny Oklahoma's Muslims access to the judicial system on the same terms as every other citizen. The state appealed that ruling.
SEE: Judge Rules in Favor of Muslim Man on State Question 755
You can read the lower court's ruling here.
Last year, CAIR and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a brief urging the circuit court to uphold the lower court's ruling blocking implementation of the amendment.
You can read the CAIR-ACLU brief here.
Today's appeals court ruling states in part:
"We conclude that Mr. Awad's allegation -- that the proposed state amendment expressly condemns his religion and exposes him and other Muslims in Oklahoma to disfavored treatment -- suffices to establish the kind of direct injury-in-fact necessary to create Establishment Clause standing. ...
"Appellants do not identify any actual problem the challenged amendment seeks to solve. Indeed, they admitted at the preliminary injunction hearing that they did not know of even a single instance where an Oklahoma court had applied Sharia law or used the legal precepts of other nations or cultures, let alone that such applications or uses had resulted in concrete problems in Oklahoma."
To read the ruling, go here.
"Today's ruling is a victory for the Constitution and for the right of all Americans to freely practice their faith," said CAIR Staff Attorney Gadeir Abbas, who is co-counsel on the case.
"This is an important reminder that the Constitution is the last line of defense against a rising tide of anti-Muslim bigotry in our society, and we are pleased that the appeals court recognized that fact," said CAIR-OK's Awad.
Awad noted that Oklahoma's anti-Sharia amendment is just one of more than 20 similar pieces of legislation introduced in state legislatures nationwide.
CAIR: Penn. Interfaith Leaders to Challenge Anti-Sharia Bill
CONTACT: CAIR Staff Attorney Gadeir Abbas, 720-251-0425, E-Mail: gabbas@cair.com; CAIR-Oklahoma Executive Director Muneer Awad, 405-248-5853, mawad@cair.com; CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper, 202-744-7726, E-Mail:ihooper@cair.com
IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUESTED:
CAIR is monitoring the introduction of anti-Sharia legislation nationwide. Please donate TODAY to make ensure that we have the legal resources needed to challenge this well-coordinated and well-financed effort to marginalize American Muslims and to demonize Islam.
No comments:
Post a Comment